#argue
3 discoveries · Hand-picked discoveries from the open web, newest first.
-
you can't argue that Watchmen 2 has something to say, you can only argue whether or not you are willing to hear it
archive - contact - sexy exciting merchandise - search - about ← previous November 9th, 2026 next November 9th, 2026: If "Watchmen" had been named "Watchman" instead, then my sequel could be called "Watchmen" instead and it would fit REALLY well, but I guess they weren't thinking about that?? – Ryan
Dinosaur Comics · EN
-
Argue about Risk Management Speed, not p(doom)
This post is written in a personal capacity. All opinions expressed are solely those of the author. I. Executive Summary There’s a mismatch that I’d like to correct between: the reasons why superintelligence is dangerous, and the categories we use to describe how dangerous superintelligence is. The most important cluster of reasons why a superintelligent model is dangerous is that it (i) could quickly kill or impoverish billions of people, (ii) could be very different from its predecessors, and (iii) can’t easily be altered once it’s deployed or otherwise widely distributed. The combination of
LessWrong · EN